297. the fame monster
once again i got hold of a leaked copy of lady gaga's the fame monster.Album Review 67: Lady Gaga - The Fame Monster
1. Bad Romance - 5/5
2. Alejandro - 4/5
3. Monster – 4.5/5
4. Speechless – 3.5/5
5. Dance In The Dark - 5/5
6. Telephone – 4.5/5
7. So Happy I Could Die - 4/5
8. Teeth - 3/5
Lady Gaga - The Fame Monster:
33.5/8 = 4.19
this album is less boring than the fame, with the singing sort of becoming more casual, and the songs adding in more elements to make it like some sort of rain dance ceremony. great album with great songs so she should have made more songs to turn this into a proper album instead of becoming an ep. but it's already good that she doesn't turn this into the newly released tracks from a re-released edition. great for her!
Labels: album
posted by datf @ 11/17/2009 02:04:00 pm
6 Comments:
The ethical issue aside of stealing leaked albums (think of how much less money Lady Gaga can make for her penis removal)
Do you sympathetic readers not feel as I do that the entire review of The Fame Monster reeks of "I hate Taylor Swift!!"?
I mean fine, I hate Taylor Swift as well, but liking an album because it's only an EP, not a re-released platinum/diamond/obsidian/sapphire edition (how come there aren't more creative gems in album ratings?) is like (to use one of the idioms I learnt in my 4-day Youtube spree) 有奶便是娘. So DATF, stop attempting to throw acid on Taylor, she's already disfigured enough as she is (Doesn't she look exactly like a vixen? With blond hair?)
To be fair to Lady Gaga, great album (fine so I got a leaked copy too), maybe a tad too alienised. Perhaps the next album can be Alien Gaga?
why would the readers be sympathetic? anyway this post shows more of a i hate re-releases than i hate taylor swift, please read carefully.
who uses gems in album ratings. diamond, platinum, such terms are only used in album certifications, to see how much an album sold. i agree taylor swift looks like a vixen, especially her eyes, it's so slanted that it looks like fox's eyes.
i don't give an album a higher score because it's not a re-release. the scores are fairly given according to what i think it deserves. my albums are graded as individual songs, and not an opinion of the album as a whole. why would i want to rig the scores for each song to make it higher for godamn sake. my scores are open and purely reflect MY VIEW! MY VIEW OK! THIS IS A HONOLOGUE SO FUCKING STOP IMPOSING YOUR CRAPPY VIEW OF WHAT YOU THINK I'M DOING. ONE MORE UNTRUE REMARK AND YOU'RE OUT OF HERE YOU POLITICALLYFAILED BASTARD!
Considering I started this parasitic blog just to get on your nerves anyway (The uppercased part doesn't sound like you, strange)
the uppercase part doesnt sound like me, true. i just wanted to scold you a little.
See, I know you inside out
you only know me outside but not in. but sometimes my inside changes my outside, you maybe you dont even know me inside or out.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home