74. the gay theory

i have written out my own gay theory. it's simple.

Gay properties in gays are shown when there is a presence of males, just like acidic properties being shown in acid when there is a presence of water.

wonderful isn't it.

anyway, there was a fire drill yesterday while we were at ihe. everyone was strolling towards the field. the most encouraging phrase being said by the teacher was "we will try it again." and im so looking forward to that being in the middle of a boring double period lesson.

valentine's day yesterday, but what's so nice about it to celebrate about? just giving flowers here and there. as useless as giving mandarin oranges during chinese new year. what's the use of giving madarin oranges to the other person when the other person is going to give you back the same thing, and maybe one that's rotting underneath the skin.

ren ri (human day?) was the day before yesterday, and there doesn't seem to be any significance about it. we don't receive birthday gifts anyway.

mariah carey's album will be called "e=mc^2" and released internationally on 11 april 2008. what a name. the previous name, "that chick" sounds sexier and nicer. but i think that the "mc" in e=mc^2" is supposed to stand for mariah carey.
hah, madonna's next album will come out 2 weeks after mariah's and it will be another interesting battle after the 2005 madonna's "confessions on a dance floor" vs mariah's "the emancipation of mimi", and this time both release dates are close to each other.

lastly, i simply must comment on ching hun's use of twit and chat-speak language which i should refer to as chat-twit. this sort of language is totally disgusting, not readable, and lame, try-to-act-cool-when-not-cool-at-all stunt. i couldn't type out what he's written because it's too long and only empty brained people like him bother to remember the exact number of alphabets in each long word. who could decipher it. only some other chat-twit speaking person could. but i certainly couldn't. because i support people to type out their damn words correctly.

sometimes even in certain sms, i had to take extra time to decipher the message just because of the excessive use of long and unnecessary sms languages. why type "guai lan" when you could type "guai" or "strange" when it's shorter and more proper. and why type "love" as "lurb" in "i lurb u" when "lurb" and "love" has the same number of letters. these strange creatures known as punks are just too odd. and also, just how many ways of laughing are there? "lol", "lmao", "rofl". "lol": well it's ok. "lmao": will your ass really drop off by laughing? i would like to see those "lmao" users try. "rofl": as if something was really so funny that you had to laugh an roll about on the floor like a pig in the mud. something more acceptable that could be invented should be "ltic", which could mean "laugh till i cry". this seems more acceptable than "rofl" and "lmao".

lalala, bye.

posted by datf @ 2/15/2008 08:26:00 pm